Neuroethics is a relatively new interdisciplinary field of research that studies the impact of modern neuroscience on self-awareness, the development of biomedicine, political, legal and moral spheres of human activity. Debate unfolding in the Neuroethics include consideration of the basic principles of normative ethics neurophysiology, as well as concepts such as free will, moral responsibility, the autonomy of the individual and the individual.
Abstract
Neuroethics is a relatively new, multidisciplinary field of study the influences of current neurology and neuroscience on human consciousness, biomedicine and the political and legal spheres of life. Philosophical debates are developing within neuroethics include consideration of the basic principles of normative neuroscience ethics, as well as concepts such as free agency, moral responsibility, a personality and individual autonomy.
Keywords: Neuroethics, Neurophysiology, Neuroimaging, Neyrotipirovanie; manipulative neuroscience, brain-computer interface; Neyroinzheneriya.
Keywords: Neuroethics; Neuroimaging; Manipulative neuroscience; Brain-computer interface; Brainotyping; Neuroengineering.
Журнал ВалеологияTo view "2012 DM Lazurenko *, VN Kiroy "Modern problems of Neuroethics" (Automatic translation)"
you need to register or login to your account.
1. Aldhous P., Prospect of data sharing gives brain mappers a headache. Nature, 406 (2000), pp. 445–446.
2. Allison T., Neuroscience and morality. Neuroscientist, 7 (2001), pp. 360–364.
3. Bayliss J.D., Ballard D.H. A virtual reality testbed for brain–computer interface research// IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 2000. 8. P.188–190.
4. Transmission latencies in a telemetry-linked brain–machine interface. / Bossetti C.A. [et al.]// IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 51 (2004), pp. 919–924.
5. Cerqui D., The future of humankind in the era of human and computer hybridization: an anthropological analysis. Ethics Inf. Technol., 4 (2002), pp. 101–108.
6. Donoghue J.P., Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces. Nat. Neurosci, 5 Suppl. (2002), pp. 1085–1088.
7. Farah M.J., Neuroethics: a guideline for the perplexed. Cerebrum, 6 (2004), pp. 29–38.
8. Farah M.J. and Wolpe P.R., Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hasting Center Rep., 34 (2004), pp. 35–45.
9. Farah M.J., Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn. Sci., 9 (2005), pp. 34–40
10. Brain–machine and brain–computer interfaces. / Friehs G.M. [et al.]// Stroke, 35 (2004), pp. 2702–2705.
11. Fukushi T, Sakura O, Koizumi H. Ethical considerations of neuroscience research: the perspectives on neuroethics in Japan, Neurosci Res. 2007 Jan;57(1):10-6. Epub 2006, Oct 10.
12. Gazzaniga M.S., The Ethical Brain, Dana Press, Washington, DC (2005).
13. Greene J. and Cohen J., For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, (2004), pp. 1775–1785.
14. Illes J., A fish story? Brain maps, lie detection, and personhood. Cerebrum, 6 (2004), pp. 73–81.
15. Illes J. and Racine E., Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am. J. Bioeth., 5 (2005), pp. 5–18.
16. BCIs in Multimodal Interaction and Multitask Environments: Theoretical Issues and Initial Guidelines / Jan B. F. van Erp [et al.]// Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, Volume 6766/2011, 610-619.
17. Kamitani Y. and Tong F., Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat. Neurosci., 8 (2005), pp. 679–685.
18. Kagawa, C., 2006. Bioethics: two types of ethics based on its history. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop of Brain Science and Ethics (in Japanese).
19. Knoppers B.M., Neuroethics, new ethics?. Am. J. Bioeth., 5 (2005), p. 33.
20. Electrocorticography-based brain computer interface—the seattle experience / Leuthardt E.C. [et al.]// IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2006. V.14. N.2. P.194–198.
21. Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain–computer interface / Lulé D. [et al.]// Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug 21, In Press.
22. Marcus S.J., Editor, Neuroethics: Mapping the Field, Dana Press, Washington, DC (2002).
23. Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks. / McClure S.M. [et al.]// Neuron. 2004; 44: 379-387.
24. Neuroethics of neuromarketing. / Murphy Emily R. [et al.]// Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7: 293–302 (2008)
25. Reconstructing visual experiences from brain activity evoked by natural movies. / Nishimoto Shinji [et al.]// Current Biology, published online September 22, 2011.
26. A microelectrode/microelectronic hybrid device for brain implantable neuroprosthesis applications. / Patterson W.R.[et al.]// EEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 51 (2004), pp. 1845–1853.
27. Walking from thought /Pfurtscheller G. e.a.//Brain Res. 2006b. 1071. P.145–152.
28. Roskies A., Neuroethics for the New Millennium. Neuron, 35 (2002), pp. 21–23
29. Sentenita W., Neuroethical considerations: cognitive library and converging technologies for improving human cognition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1013 (2004), pp. 221–228.
30. Deep brain stimulation in the management of disorders of consciousness: A review of physiology, previous reports, and ethical considerations / Sen AN [et al.]// Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Aug;29(2):E14.
31. Schermer M. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation. Front. Integr. Neurosci., 09 May 2011 | doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00017
32. Shen Francis X., Jones Owen D. Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons. Mercer Law Review, Vol. 62, 2011, p. 861 .
33. Rat navigation guided by remote control. / Talwar S.K. [et al.]// Nature, 417 (2002), pp. 37–38.
34. A multi-channel telemetry system for brain microstimulation in freely roaming animals./ Talwar S.K. [et al.]// J. Neurosci. Methods, 133 (2004), pp. 57–63.
35. A review on directional information in neural signals for brain-machine interfaces / Waldert S. [et al.]// Journal of Physiology. Paris. In Press. Corrected Proof. August 2009.
36. Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. / Wessberg J [et al.]// Nature, 408 (2000), pp. 361–365.
37. Wilfond B.S. and Ravitsky V., On the proliferation of bioethics sub-disciplines: do we really need “genethics” and neuroethics?.Am. J. Bioeth., 5 (2005), pp. 20–21.
38. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control / Wolpaw J.R. [et al.]// Clin. Neurophysiol., 2002. V. 113, № 6. P. 767–791.
| Твитнуть |
|
Only registered users can write comments. Please, register or log in to your account.
No comments yet.